Vaccines » An Epidemic of Media Misinformation
An Epidemic of Media Misinformation
A number of manufactured, pro-vaccine talking points constituting large portions of recent books by Paul Offit and Seth Mnookin are spreading throughout the media as if they were contagious. Their misinformation is affecting newspapers and websites from coast to coast.
In Michigan the Kalamazoo Gazette claims:
A growing number of parents are refusing to immunize their children and:
...diseases thought long gone are making a comeback.
But vaccination rates are at all time highs. The small rise in exemptions (from say perhaps .05% to .2%) is negated by rises among the general population. After all you wouldn't say, after losing a five-dollar bill but then finding a ten dollar one, that you had a net loss of five dollars
As to the second point, throughout the entire vaccine era there have been small outbreaks of vaccine-preventable illnesses, yet the author would have us believe it was 1950 again and every child was contracting the measles, mumps and chicken pox
The Gazette then rolls out the obligatory pediatrician and public health official. First we're then treated to the lamentations of Pediatrician Eric Slosberg regarding the reluctance of some parents to do as their told and vaccinate:
“It’s very frustrating; to be frank, it’s like talking to a brick wall,”
We'll Eric, there's a flipside to that. I'm very frustrated that you and your public health comrades can't take no for an answer and leave parents alone. It's kind of like talking to a brick wall. Some people don't want vaccines; get over it.
A Dr. Allan Lareau, of Bronson Rambling Road Pediatrics, in Kalamazoo then weighs in:
“Based on all available literature, evidence and current studies, there is no evidence to support that vaccines cause autism or other developmental disabilities,” Lareau said. “It’s way beyond a reasonable doubt at this point — vaccines are not a cause of autism."
Sadly Dr. Lareau, like so many birds of a feather in the medical community, wants us to believe an absence of evidence due to a lack of investigation is the equivalent of a rigorous investigation of a possible link turning up no association.
Finally, in a point that seems to contradict the entire article - that people fleeing vaccination in droves - we discover:
Statewide, only about 4 percent of all children did not get vaccinated last year.
Its not any better in Baltimore where the Sun call measles and mumps "dreadful diseases"
While in Pittsburgh, an article appearing in The Post-Gazette begins:
In the face of increasing evidence that families who oppose vaccination are endangering their own children and public health, some doctors and patients are starting to fight back.
As I've stated before infectious illnesses are a part of living among other people. Therefore people choosing to live around others are at risk of catching something. My decision to forgo vaccines doesn't place others at risk, it just leaves them where they started.
And "fighting back?" How can you "fight back" when nobody's fighting with you. Just take your vaccine and go away - no fight. Their claims of fighting back are analogous to a thief fighting back against those refusing to be robbed.
Not to be denied a whack at the dead horse of the 2010 pertussis epidemic, the article's author continues:
in some pockets on the West Coast, 20 to 30 percent of the residents are unvaccinated...As a result, California is now experiencing its worst whooping cough outbreak in 50 years, with nearly 9,000 people infected and 10 children dead, and Pennsylvania's cases jumped more than 50 percent last year, to 950.
The piece continues, bemoaning the demise of the herd:
...there is an unsettling decrease in "herd immunity" in the American population. When vaccination rates are high, it doesn't matter if some individuals get preventable diseases, because they won't be able to spread very far.
Even though, and I don't know how many ways to say this, VACCINATION RATES ARE AT ALL-TIME HIGHS!!!
A great friend of vaccination, Dr Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic, then appears claiming:
...about three of every 1,000 people who get measles die from it.
The doctor employs a common tactic of the vaccinator: make the illness seem more dangerous than it actually is.
Poland's probably constructing his numbers from data accumulated during the early 90s where mild measles cases were underreported and infants were more vulnerable than in the pre-vaccine era because mothers passed on less effective maternal antibodies (due to gaining immunity from vaccination and not natural infection).
Additionally the epidemic was concentrated among the poor: a group that is more severely effected by almost any infectious illness.
A more accurate measure of measles severity is derived from the CDC's estimate that ~3 to 4 million children contracted the illness each year resulting in 450-500 deaths - leaving us with a mortality ratio of ~1-8,000. And even that ratio overestimates the likelihood of death in a healthy child since those with risk factors such as malnutrition are far more likely to experience severe cases - just as a smoker is far more likely to suffer from lung cancer.
Next, Julius Youngner, who helped develop the Salk polio vaccine is quoted:
"When you have a disease like smallpox where 30 percent who get the disease die, and you have this terrible scarring with the survivors, vaccine eradication becomes very popular," he said.
Apparently Younger hasn't read the aforementioned Baltimore Sun piece that states:
Brandeis University historian Michael Willrich is writing a book on the history of smallpox, and in an essay in The New York Times, he describes government troops and city policemen wielding clubs for the forcible administration of smallpox vaccine to suspicious factory workers and immigrants.
Finally it's back to Dr. Poland who ends on an "encouraging" note:
I've found...vaccine-hesitant parents can be reached with targeted education."
Of course those familiar with this vaccine establishment tactics know "targeted education" is simply a euphemism for propaganda
In conclusion, we examine the Manhattan Institute's City Journal where the authors - one of whom is the director of the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Medical Progress - open with a combination of parrotry and typical establishment deception, squawking:
Vaccines, which save millions of lives every year,
Somehow they fail to mention that, even if these numbers were correct, they apply, not to America where we live, but to Africa, India and other remote corners of the globe where abysmal living condition play a far more powerful role that do mean old bugs and germs.
Then, turning their attention to the poor dead horse of pertussis (now battered beyond all recognition and only identifiable through dental records), they query:
Why, then, is that sickness [pertussis] making a scary comeback in California, which is currently weathering its largest whooping-cough epidemic since 1947, with over 7,800 cases and 10 deaths in 2010? Mainly because more and more parents, worried about the vaccine’s supposed side effects, are choosing to delay vaccinating their children—or not to do it at all.
Their next talking point claims that it's those damn "affluent and well-educated" who are spoiling everything for the rest of us by failing to comply with the wishes of our omniscient public health mandarins. This talking point seems to be an attempt to stir up a little class warfare and turn American against American - after all, since when is wise to follow not the educated but the poor and ignorant?
The piece ends talking about "today’s anti-vaccine hysteria" which corresponds to their notion that anyone who declines a vaccine must be out of their minds (either naturally or as a result of panic, fear or hysteria) But I, and most others I know, when deciding against vaccination, was of sound mind and not in someway impaired.
Apparently unable to think for themselves, these "journalists" just parrot the spoon-fed talking points of public health functionaries. So when reading one of these stories extolling the miracles of vaccination, look past the feathers and see the facts. And remember, just because a parrot repeats something doesn't mean it's true.
Robert Schecter is the parent of a fifteen year old unvaccinated daughter; a stock & commodities investor, writer, founder & editor of The Vaccine Machine: a blog challenging the vested interests dedicated to vaccinating our children by any means necessary.